Rework locking to use advisory locks instead of row locks#520
Open
Rework locking to use advisory locks instead of row locks#520
Conversation
In an attempt to reduce the xact locking burden, stop using transaction- linked locks for all our concurrency and start using advisory locks instead. Is this likely to just be changing one problem for another? I don't know, but now there will certainly be fewer row locks under contention...
Contributor
Author
|
grrr tests that don't actually use pg and so obviously don't have advisory locks... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In an attempt to reduce the xact locking burden, stop using transaction- linked locks for all our concurrency and start using advisory locks instead. Is this likely to just be changing one problem for another? I don't know, but now there will certainly be fewer row locks under contention...