chore: add CodeRabbit configuration for automated PR reviews#1066
chore: add CodeRabbit configuration for automated PR reviews#1066jeremyeder wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Adds exhaustive .coderabbit.yaml with all settings explicitly set. Key choices: concise blocking-only reviews, performance and security pre-merge checks, K8s resource safety checks, component-specific path instructions, org-wide learnings, and issue auto-enrichment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Comment |
|
This is a combination of what the OpenShift team does and what I got from CodeRabbit engineers that they use. I then went through setting by setting. I also had it review https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration.md as part of the buildout of the .coderabbit.yaml in this PR. |
|
LGTM |
| 3. Expensive work inside loops (API calls, JSON parsing, regex compilation). | ||
| 4. Unbounded growth: caches, watchers, buffers without eviction/limits. | ||
| 5. Missing pagination/limits on List operations or API endpoints. | ||
| 6. Frontend: unnecessary rerenders, missing memoization, unvirtualized large lists. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| 6. Frontend: unnecessary rerenders, missing memoization, unvirtualized large lists. | |
| 6. Frontend: unnecessary rerenders, missing memoization, unvirtualized large lists, missing dependency arrays, unbounded localStorage, sessionStorage or Cookies. Blocking HTTP requests. |
Summary
.coderabbit.yamlwith every available setting explicitly set (defaults annotated with# defaultfor easy auditing)Key Decisions
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code