Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new security-hardened PostgreSQL RPC function Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Caller
participant RPC as rescind_invitation()
participant Rights as public.check_min_rights()
participant Orgs as organizations table
participant Tmp as tmp_users table
Caller->>RPC: CALL rescind_invitation(email, org_id)
RPC->>Rights: VERIFY caller rights for org_id
Rights-->>RPC: [allowed|denied]
alt denied
RPC-->>Caller: "NO_RIGHTS"
else allowed
RPC->>Orgs: CHECK org exists (org_id)
Orgs-->>RPC: [exists|not found]
alt not found
RPC-->>Caller: "NO_INVITATION"
else exists
RPC->>Tmp: SELECT invitation by email+org_id
Tmp-->>RPC: [row|no row]
alt no row
RPC-->>Caller: "NO_INVITATION"
else row
alt cancelled_at IS NOT NULL
RPC-->>Caller: "ALREADY_CANCELLED"
else
RPC->>Tmp: UPDATE cancelled_at = now()
Tmp-->>RPC: updated
RPC-->>Caller: "OK"
end
end
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In
`@supabase/migrations/20260308203222_fix_rescind_invitation_rpc_access_hardening.sql`:
- Around line 37-52: The SELECT that reads the temporary invitation into
tmp_user is racy; modify the SELECT ... INTO tmp_user query (the one that
selects from public.tmp_users using rescind_invitation.email and
rescind_invitation.org_id) to append FOR UPDATE so the row is locked for the
duration of the transaction, ensuring subsequent logic (the IF
tmp_user.cancelled_at check and the UPDATE of public.tmp_users) sees the
serialized state and the second concurrent call returns ALREADY_CANCELLED.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b842f3f9-55ae-4591-9dce-7213c8c628d0
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
supabase/migrations/20260308203222_fix_rescind_invitation_rpc_access_hardening.sql
supabase/migrations/20260308203222_fix_rescind_invitation_rpc_access_hardening.sql
Show resolved
Hide resolved
5a9c37f to
936266a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@supabase/tests/28_test_new_migration_functions.sql`:
- Around line 240-251: The pgTAP plan declaration still reads plan(28) but you
added two assertions (rescind_invitation tests), so update the plan count to
plan(30) where the file declares the test plan (the initial plan(...) near the
top of the SQL file and the other matching plan declaration referenced in the
similar block around lines where the second set of rescind_invitation assertions
appear) so the planned test count matches the actual assertions; search for the
literal "plan(28)" and change it to "plan(30)" to fix the planned-vs-ran
mismatch.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b91a1b2a-5def-400a-b0da-0da453dbeedc
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
supabase/tests/28_test_new_migration_functions.sql
|



Summary (AI generated)
public.rescind_invitationby denying unauthenticated execution, keeping sensitive behavior secure, and preserving existing authorized status outcomes.NO_RIGHTSresponse across missing/invalid org IDs and thatanoncannot execute the RPC.Test plan (AI generated)
bun lint:backend.git diff origin/main...HEAD.Screenshots (AI generated)
Checklist (AI generated)
bun run lint:backend && bun run lint.accordingly.
my tests.