Draft EVES-008: On-Chain Identity & Revocation Management#36
Closed
siyovush-hamidov wants to merge 6 commits intoASCS-eV:mainfrom
Closed
Draft EVES-008: On-Chain Identity & Revocation Management#36siyovush-hamidov wants to merge 6 commits intoASCS-eV:mainfrom
siyovush-hamidov wants to merge 6 commits intoASCS-eV:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces a draft for EVES-008, which defines the core on-chain identity architecture for the ENVITED-X ecosystem.
Based on our recent architectural discussions, this specification covers three main pillars:
Adoption of the did:ethr method on Etherlink.
IPFS-backed management of the Credential Revocation Set (CRSet) linked via DID document services.
A Gas Station Relay Service to enable frictionless, gasless onboarding for companies.
This is an initial draft to gather feedback from the community and Editors. Looking forward to your reviews and suggestions on what needs to be refined!